On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, Ryszard Glab wrote: > > Yes. This will be nice solution. The only one problem is with > > temporary test if in our RTL code will not appear calls to new > > RDD functions which may force linking both modules. But of course > > it's a minor problem. > Can we create then two libraries: > harbour - with vm+rtl+rdd > harbourn - with wm+rtl+nulsys and without rdd code
Interesting. But please remember that we will have HVM version for MT mode. In current terminology I wanted to call it hbvmmt. with such common library we will need harbourmt. In such case I rather will not want to make more harbour libraries because we will have to create each of them in ST and MT version. best regards, Przemek _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
