On Feb 9, 2008 9:43 PM, Szakáts Viktor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It could certainly help in the future that such concerns > would be expressed before deciding about these changes, > yet, all I got was silence (from you) and a few approvals.
At that time I thought that all the core developers agreed on it. In this case my opinion doesn't matter but when the "change" showed to be more complex than expected I simply suggested a quick solution: revert and plan it more carefully. Now it's clear that even other core developers had not a clear idea of the results of this change and so I expressed my opinion with the aim to find a solution. Why gtwvw moved to hbgtwvw and back to gtwvw? Because gt libs are "drivers" exactly like dbfcdx. What I mean is that rtl lib is never referenced in the code while dbfcdx need a REQUEST and a RddSetDefault so DBFCDX name will never die and adding rddcdx will not make things more clear. best regards, Lorenzo _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
