Hello,
Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> writes: > Hello, > > Ekaitz Zarraga <eka...@elenq.tech> writes: > >> So yeah, spacecadet, if you really want to continue to package it, we >> would add it to Guix, I don't think there's any policy in Guix against >> it (unless their documentation or so is also part of the package and >> includes political messages that promote any kind of >> discrimination). > > This is entirely correct. However, as a project, we have a code of > conduct and generally work to be inclusive, which is apparently the > exact opposite of what this people are doing. > > I think we can’t ignore it or we’d be sending the wrong signal. Everything can be intrepreted as sending a bad/good signal by someone. But it is important if it really is sending a signal. In this situation, by agreeing on not including it, it is definitely sending a signal. While on the other hand, if Guix's stance would be to package any software, because the software is important, not who writes it, I don't think any signal is being sent as regarding to who is author of such software. It is only if Guix starts choosing if to include/exclude software based on the authors of that software when Guix starts showing a stance in regards to that and becomes more political. > > Thanks, > Ludo’. Rutherther
