Hi Inan, > Ultimately, this kind of decision is a judgement call on the part > of the committers reviewing the patches. In this case, the > concensus is clear that the Guix convention should be upheld.
Sorry to hear that [1], but I do not authorize guix to pick a different name, for its g-golf package - then the upstream (gnu project) package (and project) name that is. > Practically speaking, your choices at this time are to accept the > conventions, or submit a patch removing g-golf from Guix. Yes, I wish g-golf be removed from guix. I'll submit a patch: please allow me to send the patch to this list, I not a guix-patches list member. Thanks, David [1] History will recall that I (initially very kindly) expressed my request to guix to not pick a different name, for its g-golf package - then the upstream (gnu project) package (and fwiw project) name that is.
pgp22ZfJ5vt4D.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
