Hello Andreas, > we have packaging guidelines to make things predictable for users
Imo, this is a counter argument: users do hear about GNU G-Golf, g-golf, through emails, #guile, #guix, #gtk, #introspection ... dedicated 'news' websites ... not because of guix. By renaming, guix actually turns itself the most unpredictable distro. > it is not up to every author/committer to name things as they wish. Quite the opposite: it should not be up to the distro to rename upstream projects as they wish. At the very least, the distro should ask for an authorization. > As a first rule, the upstream name g-golf should be kept as is. There should be no other rule. Regards, David
pgpUAYUNcIdKf.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature