Hi David, David Pirotte <da...@altosw.be> writes:
[...] >> As a first rule, the upstream name g-golf should be kept as is. > > There should be no other rule. I think our naming rules are reasonable. Interpreted language *libraries* are typically prefixed by the interpreter name, e.g. 'python-markdown', although the upstream name is 'Markdown', which would make for a confusing package name if it was kept that way. So our users are used to expect for example Guile libraries to be prefixed by 'guile-'; it also makes searching by name a bit more convenient. Since g-golf is a Guile library, our established convention is to name it 'guile-g-golf'. If it had been command instead of a Guile library, 'g-golf' would have been used instead. -- Thanks, Maxim
