Hi, great question. We have been getting better at tracking down general performance issues and breakage, but usually we don't know which sites this is happening on. I think there are two parts here: - Understanding which domains things happen on, e.g. on which sites did feature X break. - Understanding what the actual top sites are in Firefox to inform testing and investigations.
Neither of these are settled yet, but were specific asks that came up. Collecting these - in a privacy-preserving way - would be valuable. Georg On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 3:41 PM, ledentist--- via governance < governance@lists.mozilla.org> wrote: > hi there. > > i do not understand the need to know the top 100 sites for improving the > "product". > > can you explain? > > i see a lot of big issues which should be improved regarding the > performance and an overloaded feature-set, ui-quirks and several page > rendering issues. > > none of these would be addressed by accessing, analysing and storing even > anonymously gathered user data. > _______________________________________________ > governance mailing list > governance@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance > _______________________________________________ governance mailing list governance@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
