Hi Siva, i believe David already addressed the first point.
For opt-in bias, this is a real problem. The proportion of users opting into data collection is low and not representative. For opting out, user choice and control is important for us. We always give the user control over their data, so everything can be disabled in the preferences. Georg On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 4:44 PM, siva.rk.sw--- via governance < governance@lists.mozilla.org> wrote: > > Asks for sensitive data center most commonly around knowing something in > > relation to which sites a user visits: > > > > - > > > > "Which top sites are users visiting?" > > - > > > > "Which sites using Flash does a user encounter?" > > - > > > > "Which sites does a user see heavy Jank on?" > > > > In summary most asks are for occurrences of an event X per domain (more > > specifically eTLD+1 [1], e.g. facebook.com or google.co.uk). > > > Hello Georg, three questions: > > 1. Could you explain exactly what kinds of problems (which are currently a > big source of trouble) would be solved easily with the currently proposed > plan? And also what kinds of problems cannot be solved with this data, but > could be solved with more invasive data collection? > > 2. What exactly is the problem if the collection is opt-in? Yes the data > is "biased", so what? Are you worried that you might miss certain issues > faced mostly by users who don't opt in? Is there any justification for this > argument, or is it just a hunch? > > 3. For those users who consider privacy most valuable, would there be an > easy way to opt out, which *guarantees* that Mozilla collects *no > information* about their browser usage? > > Thank you. > > Siva > _______________________________________________ > governance mailing list > governance@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance > _______________________________________________ governance mailing list governance@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
