On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 5:59 PM, dan.callahan--- via governance <governance@lists.mozilla.org> wrote: > Differential privacy is a great tool, however, I'm concerned that even if we > do everything *technically* correctly to preserve user privacy, the *optics* > associated with this sort of data collection were not address in this email. > > We attempted to do similarly with User Profile ("UP") / Directory Tiles > projects in Content Services, which proposed completely local history > analysis for purposes of advertising and content discovery. All of which was > done in a way that absolutely protected user privacy (the analysis never left > the local machine), but we weren't able to overcome the superficial > impression that Firefox was tracking users.
I think Dan's point is super-important. Reputational damage will occur if people *think* Mozilla performs a privacy violation even if the technical implementation was carefully privacy-preserving. It's difficult for me to imagine a scenario where the usefulness of the results of the planned study could outweigh the risk of a meme of Mozilla doing something privacy violating spreading around. That's why, I think Mozilla should not gather opt-out telemetry that sends information about the sites accessed in any manner (even if users could deem it privacy-preserving after looking into the details of the implementation; my concern is about the case when users form their opinion without reading papers from arxiv, etc.). As a Gecko developer, very much want to see feature usage data and, while I haven't had the need yet, I can very well imagine needing in-the-field performance metrics. I don't want users to opt out of or not to opt into feature usage and performance telemetry because they think that enabling it would send a list of the sites accessed to Mozilla. So I would like to ask that Mozilla categorically not gather telemetry about sites accessed and *clearly say so* in order to maximize user comfort with having feature usage and performance telemetry enabled. Failing that, I would like to ask that feature usage and performance metrics be behind a different checkbox than telemetry about sites accessed and the latter be clearly opt-in. (And, yes, I realize that having a different checkbox for the latter makes it look more nefarious, because the distinct checkbox implies an admission that the two are somehow of different impact.) -- Henri Sivonen hsivo...@hsivonen.fi https://hsivonen.fi/ _______________________________________________ governance mailing list governance@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance