> Asks for sensitive data center most commonly around knowing something in
> relation to which sites a user visits:
> 
>    -
> 
>    "Which top sites are users visiting?"
>    -
> 
>    "Which sites using Flash does a user encounter?"
>    -
> 
>    "Which sites does a user see heavy Jank on?"
> 
> In summary most asks are for occurrences of an event X per domain (more
> specifically eTLD+1 [1], e.g. facebook.com or google.co.uk).


Hello Georg, three questions:

1. Could you explain exactly what kinds of problems (which are currently a big 
source of trouble) would be solved easily with the currently proposed plan? And 
also what kinds of problems cannot be solved with this data, but could be 
solved with more invasive data collection?

2. What exactly is the problem if the collection is opt-in? Yes the data is 
"biased", so what? Are you worried that you might miss certain issues faced 
mostly by users who don't opt in? Is there any justification for this argument, 
or is it just a hunch?

3. For those users who consider privacy most valuable, would there be an easy 
way to opt out, which *guarantees* that Mozilla collects *no information* about 
their browser usage?

Thank you.

Siva
_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance

Reply via email to