On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 19:03 +0200, Simon Stelling wrote: > Jakub Moc wrote: > > Broken bugzilla affects every ebuild dev, affects GDP, affects bug > > wranglers, affects anyone else who's using it to track outstanding > > project issues. How is this continuous borkage not a global issue that > > council should discuss? > > What is there to discuss? Do you expect them to say 'bugzilla shall be > fix0rd!'? They could (in theory) demand that infra changes policies, i.e. active recruiting to reduce bottlenecks or open demands for hardware. I think it wouldn't help much though ...
> What would that change in reality? I, (and I guess so does solar) fail to see > what the council could effectively do in regard to this matter. You should > probably elaborate on that. I guess the question is "What can we do when a project misbehaves and our efforts to help are being denied?" (Please excuse the offensive formulation, but that is afaict roughly what jakub and others communicate when they wish to summon the council). Any ideas how to improve communication appreciated :-) hth, Patrick -- Stand still, and let the rest of the universe move
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
