In the past, this kind of situation occurred more frequently, but most have been corrected in recent years, precisely because people actively pointed out the issues and encouraged corrections. I'd suggest we continue to popularize the notation of PMC Member. Of course, if the MPMC acronyms is perfect and elegant, it would be worth the time to implement. But if we create a new acronyms for the sake of a very few people using it incorrectly, then it might seem a bit contrived. The term PMC Member itself is not wrong, it's just that some people have mistakenly used PMC in its place. Why would we expect that changing PMC Member to MPMC would prevent these people from using it incorrectly? If we introduce MPMC, should we also consider simultaneously add CPMC (PMC Chair) and MASF (ASF Member) to ensure that all roles have a fair acronyms? Otherwise, MPMC might seem a bit out of place.
Best Regards, Zhang Yonglun Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> 于2024年7月3日周三 08:05写道： > > Hello all, > > I am getting really tired of seeing people refer to *MEMBERS* of a PMC as > "PMCs". > > PMC stands for Project Management Committee. > > You have MEMBERS of that PMC. > > People are never to be called a PMC, nor a group of them as PMCs. People > are not committees. The acronym "PMC" is short for a committee, not a > person. > > Please stop the confusion. Teach the community how to use the proper terms. > > Thanks, > Greg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
