On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > On 2015-07-22 01:17, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >> Nitpicking time. >>> >>> Your supposedly vendor-neutral web site says: >>> "GridGain Community Edition is a binary build of Apache Ignite created >>> by GridGain, which includes optional LGPL dependencies, such as >>> Hibernate L2 cache integration and Geospatial Indexing. It benefits from >>> continued testing by GridGain engineers and may contain latest bug fixes >>> and features that will be included into the future official Apache >>> Ignite releases." >>> >>> - I consider this very biased towards a single company (especially >>> considering it is the _only_ 3rd party listed, and you do _not_ specify >>> how other 3rd parties may get listed on the page). >>> >> >> Good point. I have added text specifying how other companies can provide >> their community editions for Apache Ignite. >> > > Excellent! > > >> You start off by saying you don't endorse it, and then you praise it - >> it's >> >>> either or. >>> >> >> We started out by providing just a blank link, but it became very >> confusing >> to our users, and we allowed GridGain to add a brief description. >> >> I have just updated the text of the description to strip it out of >> anything >> other than facts. I don't think it conflicts with Ignite not officially >> endorsing this edition. >> > Thanks :) > I still find it a bit problematic that the text infers that GridGain's 3rd > party binary is somehow "potentially upstream" from Apache Ignite, but I > will defer to Shane to decide whether that is allowed or not. > > >> Your web site also lists the organizational affiliation of PMC members. >>> While this may be useful internally in the ASF, I fail to see why this >>> is mentioned on the web site. This should have no relevance to the >>> project whatsoever. >>> >>> Although I see your point, I don't think it's harmful one way or >> another. >> All the community members voluntarily and willingly provided their company >> affiliation. >> > > To be clear, I am not about to veto a graduation vote because of company > affiliations, I just don't think it belongs on the page. > If/when you graduate, the PMC has every right to decide this for > themselves, I believe. > Looking at how this discussion is going, I think we should leave it as is for now in the interest of transparency. > > >> You point to gridgain.org for several of your documentation segments, >>> this is also not acceptable. >>> >>> This is not on purpose. The documentation was initially migrated from >> GridGain and some old links might have sneaked in. >> >> I cannot find any places with gridgain.org links you are referencing. Can >> you please point those out, so I can quickly fix them? >> > > http://ignite.incubator.apache.org/features/datagrid.html > http://ignite.incubator.apache.org/features/igniterdd.html > etc. > I think you should just grep for it in your features directory, there may > be more pages that refer to it. > I fixed it in a bunch of places by doing a grep. If you find anything I missed, please let me know.
