I'm still confused why you say Hossenfelder isn't an academic.  
Scholar.google.com doesn't see it that way:  Cited by 5,426.   She has recent 
publications.   

-----Original Message-----
From: Friam <friam-boun...@redfish.com> On Behalf Of glen
Sent: Friday, November 8, 2024 1:19 PM
To: friam@redfish.com
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] How democracies die

1. What does "98% binary" even mean? Is that similar to "a little bit 
pregnant"? >8^D What I infer is you're claiming that 98% of humans are 
disjointly [fe]male. That's a reasonable estimate. But what's our confidence in 
that number right now? 1000 years ago? 1000 years from now? It's just not a 
scientific statement even in its generous form.

2a. As for "trans turning out biological", I'm forced to assume you mean 
trans-gender because trans-sexual is fairly well understood as biological. It's 
more than a little irritating when people say "trans" without specifying which 
one they mean, kinda like assuming research on rodents trans-lates to humans. 
(Sorry. I couldn't help myself.)

2b. I'll go ahead and assert that individual "choices" of profession are just 
as biological as everything else. A common refrain amongst the heavier drinkers 
at ALife conferences is "It's all biology." The decoupling between what some 
rando on the street asserts as a sociological "choice" and, say, a 
microorganism following a gradient has neither been demonstrated nor 
well-justified. For example, I doubt I could have "chosen" to be a professional 
football player (either meaning of "football"). I also could not have "chosen" 
to be an astronaut. Arnold Schwarzenegger could not have "chosen" to be POTUS. 
(Even Harris can't "choose" to be president.) So suffice it to say this 
certainty you hold about these "choices" seems inflated.

Speaking of *admitting* our failures, Sabine fired back at Professor Dave. And 
Dave fired back at Sabine. It was rewarding for me: 
https://youtu.be/6P_tceoHUH4 It highlights how sloppy language encourages 
sloppy comprehension. We're *all* susceptible to it and guilty of it, to 
greater or lesser extent. But what's important is how we fold it into our world 
... or don't.


On 11/8/24 09:21, Prof David West wrote:
>    - the left must admit that sex is 98% binary and gender is nothing more 
> than an individual choice that may or may not conform to local cultural 
> 'norms'. Individual choices as to gender deserve no more and no less 
> attention, and certainly not legal protection, than individual choices as to 
> profession. (Homosexuality is biological, but independent, so far as we 
> currently know, of sex determining genes. Trans will probably also turn out 
> to be biological, but probably only peripherally related to sex-determinant 
> genes.)

-- 
ꙮ Mɥǝu ǝlǝdɥɐuʇs ɟᴉƃɥʇ' ʇɥǝ ƃɹɐss snɟɟǝɹs˙ ꙮ

.- .-.. .-.. / ..-. --- --- - . .-. ... / .- .-. . / .-- .-. --- -. --. / ... 
--- -- . / .- .-. . / ..- ... . ..-. ..- .-..
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

.- .-.. .-.. / ..-. --- --- - . .-. ... / .- .-. . / .-- .-. --- -. --. / ... 
--- -- . / .- .-. . / ..- ... . ..-. ..- .-..
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Reply via email to