>Non-signed RSLs get cached on a per-session basis. They can be cleared. >Future Apache Flex RSLs will behave in this manner.
Then the beta program must have used unsigned ones. I had apps on three different servers and everything stopped working at once. Its a damned important issue. If you do things in this manner, with clearing, and the "big one" hits in California, the worlds software stops working soon after. No matter how many servers you have as backups and whereever they are,.... This is a bad idea. Dan Pride --- On Mon, 2/27/12, Nicholas Kwiatkowski <nicho...@spoon.as> wrote: > From: Nicholas Kwiatkowski <nicho...@spoon.as> > Subject: Re: Flex -> HTML, Linux and time to say goodbye? > To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org > Date: Monday, February 27, 2012, 10:01 AM > Not exactly true. > > The RSLs don't get cleared from the Flash Player > Cache. Ever. Once they > are downloaded and verified, they are there forever. > The signing is baked > into the Flash Player, and is matched with the RSL > certificate on the SWZ > files that Adobe signs for us. For current versions of > the Flash Player, > Adobe can't simply break our apps. Future versions may > not honor the > signed RSLs, and force it to be downloaded, once per > session, instead of > once per lifetime. > > You store the Adobe signed RSLs on your own server, not > Adobe's. This will > not change. > > Non-signed RSLs get cached on a per-session basis. They can > be cleared. > Future Apache Flex RSLs will behave in this manner. > > -Nick > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Dan Pride <danielpr...@yahoo.com> > wrote: > > > Everything you have written in Flex to date, unless you > specifically > > selected to compile the RSL's into your code, could > just stop working if > > somebody at adobe got their pants into a twist and > pulled the plug on the > > server. > > Your apps would all stop working at once, or the next > time your cache > > cleared. Worse, you would not at that point be able to > recompile to correct > > the problem. > > > > Dan Pride > > > > --- On Mon, 2/27/12, Jeffry Houser <jef...@dot-com-it.com> > wrote: > > > > > From: Jeffry Houser <jef...@dot-com-it.com> > > > Subject: Re: Flex -> HTML, Linux and time to > say goodbye? > > > To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org > > > Date: Monday, February 27, 2012, 9:38 AM > > > > > > I'm speaking a bit "ignorantly" > here.. but... > > > > > > Really the only RSLs that are > "Dead" are the ones > > > signed by Adobe and > > > cached across domains by the Flash Player. > You can > > > still use RSLs on > > > your own domain (and the will even be cached), > right? > > > > > > And even if the Adobe > server/cached RSLs are not able > > > to be loaded for > > > whatever reason, won't the Flash Player fall back > on the > > > "local" RSLs > > > which we distribute in the same directory of our > Flex > > > application? > > > > > > Or have I greatly misunderstood > the technology? > > > > > > On 2/27/2012 9:31 AM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote: > > > > RSLs are dead anyway for anything> > Flex > > > 4.6. I'd start looking around > > > > them today anyway. > > > > > > > > -Nick > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Dan > Pride<danielpr...@yahoo.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >>> Because people have no faith in > Adobe... > > > >> What scares the bejesus out of me is when > I > > > remember what happened to all > > > >> Flashbuilder beta apps a > couple of > > > years back. > > > >> > > > >> Is my phone going to suddenly go nuts > with clients > > > who's apps > > > >> simultaneously stopped working cause > somebody at > > > adobe to into a twist and > > > >> pulled the server? > > > >> > > > >> Seriously considering avoiding RSL's for > the > > > immediate future,,, > > > >> > > > >> Dan Pride > > > >> > > > >> --- On Mon, 2/27/12, Jeffry Houser<jef...@dot-com-it.com> > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> From: Jeffry Houser<jef...@dot-com-it.com> > > > >>> Subject: Re: Flex -> HTML, > Linux and > > > time to say goodbye? > > > >>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org > > > >>> Date: Monday, February 27, 2012, 8:36 > AM > > > >>> On 2/27/2012 8:02 AM, David Arno > > > >>> wrote: > > > >>>> As I'm sure most of you know, > Adobe > > > announced last > > > >>> Wednesday that they were > > > >>>> dumping their support for Flash > on Linux. > > > >>> That is inaccurate. > > > It'll be supported in Chrome; and > > > >>> if other browsers implement the new > plugin API; > > > those can be > > > >>> supported to. > > > >>> > > > >>>> For people whose business is > > > >>>> selling Flex apps to Linux users, > this is > > > of course > > > >>> very bad news. > > > >>> Do such people > exist? > > > >>> > > > >>>> The future of the Flash player > for Windows > > > and Mac > > > >>> seems as assured as > > > >>>> everything can be when dealing > with > > > proprietary > > > >>> systems. Likewise with Flex > > > >>>> on AIR for iOS and Android. So > what benefit > > > would there > > > >>> be in developing > > > >>>> HTML5 targets for these OS's? > > > >>> Because people have > no faith > > > in Adobe; and want Flex to > > > >>> outlive a dependency on a proprietary > runtime. > > > >>> > > > >>> -- Jeffry Houser > > > >>> Technical Entrepreneur > > > >>> 203-379-0773 > > > >>> -- > > > >>> http://www.flextras.com?c=104 > > > >>> UI Flex Components: Tested! > Supported! Ready! > > > >>> -- > > > >>> http://www.theflexshow.com > > > >>> http://www.jeffryhouser.com > > > >>> http://www.asktheflexpert.com > > > >>> -- > > > >>> Part of the DotComIt Brain Trust > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Jeffry Houser > > > Technical Entrepreneur > > > 203-379-0773 > > > -- > > > http://www.flextras.com?c=104 > > > UI Flex Components: Tested! Supported! Ready! > > > -- > > > http://www.theflexshow.com > > > http://www.jeffryhouser.com > > > http://www.asktheflexpert.com > > > -- > > > Part of the DotComIt Brain Trust > > > > > > > > >
