RSLs are dead anyway for anything > Flex 4.6.   I'd start looking around
them today anyway.

-Nick

On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Dan Pride <danielpr...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> >Because people have no faith in Adobe...
>
> What scares the bejesus out of me is when I remember what happened to all
>  Flashbuilder beta apps a couple of years back.
>
> Is my phone going to suddenly go nuts with clients who's apps
> simultaneously stopped working cause somebody at adobe to into a twist and
> pulled the server?
>
> Seriously considering avoiding RSL's for the immediate future,,,
>
> Dan Pride
>
> --- On Mon, 2/27/12, Jeffry Houser <jef...@dot-com-it.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Jeffry Houser <jef...@dot-com-it.com>
> > Subject: Re: Flex -> HTML, Linux and time to say goodbye?
> > To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Date: Monday, February 27, 2012, 8:36 AM
> > On 2/27/2012 8:02 AM, David Arno
> > wrote:
> > > As I'm sure most of you know, Adobe announced last
> > Wednesday that they were
> > > dumping their support for Flash on Linux.
> >  That is inaccurate.  It'll be supported in Chrome; and
> > if other browsers implement the new plugin API; those can be
> > supported to.
> >
> > > For people whose business is
> > > selling Flex apps to Linux users, this is of course
> > very bad news.
> >  Do such people exist?
> >
> > > The future of the Flash player for Windows and Mac
> > seems as assured as
> > > everything can be when dealing with proprietary
> > systems. Likewise with Flex
> > > on AIR for iOS and Android. So what benefit would there
> > be in developing
> > > HTML5 targets for these OS's?
> >
> >  Because people have no faith in Adobe; and want Flex to
> > outlive a dependency on a proprietary runtime.
> >
> > -- Jeffry Houser
> > Technical Entrepreneur
> > 203-379-0773
> > --
> > http://www.flextras.com?c=104
> > UI Flex Components: Tested! Supported! Ready!
> > --
> > http://www.theflexshow.com
> > http://www.jeffryhouser.com
> > http://www.asktheflexpert.com
> > --
> > Part of the DotComIt Brain Trust
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to