On Saturday, January 18, 2025 at 5:44:46 PM UTC-7 Brent Meeker wrote:




On 1/18/2025 4:32 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:



On Saturday, January 18, 2025 at 4:28:06 PM UTC-7 Brent Meeker wrote:




On 1/18/2025 5:42 AM, Alan Grayson wrote:



On Saturday, January 18, 2025 at 6:13:27 AM UTC-7 John Clark wrote:

On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 1:41 PM Alan Grayson <agrays...@gmail.com> wrote:

*> IMO SR can handle curved spacetime. All one has to do is make the 
partitions very fine, so we're approximating inertial motion along very 
short paths. AG *


*All one has to do? Well yes but that's easier said than done, it took 
Einstein 10 years of grueling work to figure out exactly how to do it, and 
the effort nearly killed him, he got sick, lost 50 pounds and figured he 
would die soon. Fortunately he did not. One of the most difficult things he 
had to figure out was how to measure distance in 4D non-Euclidean spacetime 
that was curved in any given way that was useful and never produced 
self-contradictory results. Mathematicians insist that distance must have 
the following properties:*




*1) Non-negativity: d(x,y) ≥ 0 2) Identity of indiscernibles: d(x,y) = 0 if 
and only if x = y 3) Symmetry: d(x,y) = d(y,x) 4) Triangle inequality: 
d(x,z) ≤ d(x,y) + d(y,z)*

*After years of false starts and dead ends Einstein eventually found a 
measuring stick that worked, it's called the Metric Tensor. *

*John K Clark    See what's on my new list at  Extropolis 
<https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis>*


Sorry to consume so much bandwidth here. I have one question about the LT 
and one about the Metric Tensor (MT) which will hopefully resolve most of 
my confusions.

I'll pose the LT question in the context of the TP. If the stationary twin 
at rest on the Earth uses the LT to calculate the clock reading at some 
time on the traveling twin's clock, or its clock rate using two or more 
time readings, what relationship, if any, does this have on what the 
traveler twin's clock actually reads, 

Actually reads when?

and what he observes as his clock rate? 

He observes his clock rate to be one second per second.


*IOW, using the LT, the stationary twin knows precisely what the traveling 
twin will measure for his clock rate, but the traveling twin detects 
nothing. You gotta luv it. AG*



*It's the same as length contraction, nobody ever measures time dilation 
with their own clock. Brent*

 
*So the claim that the LT yields what the target frame -- in this case the 
frame of the traveling twin  -- will measure, is false, and why I called 
these LT measuring results APPARENT. AG*

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/99ee1f58-f179-4597-bb71-83f452e6cc4an%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to