> On 12 Jun 2020, at 20:52, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 6/12/2020 11:38 AM, Jason Resch wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 1:34 PM 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List 
>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On 6/10/2020 8:50 AM, Jason Resch wrote:
>> > Thought perhaps there's an argument to be made from the church Turing 
>> > theses, which pertains to possible states of knowledge accessible to a 
>> > computer program/software. If consciousness is viewed as software then 
>> > Church-Turing thesis implies that software could never know/realize if 
>> > it's ultimate computing substrate changed.
>> 
>> I don't understand the import of this.  The very concept of software 
>> mean "independent of hardware" by definition.  It is not affected by 
>> whether CT is true or not, whether the computation is finite or not.
>> 
>> You're right. The only relevance of CT is it means any software can be run 
>> by any universal hardware. There's not some software that requires special 
>> hardware of a certain kind.
>>  
>>   If 
>> you think that consciousness evolved then it is an obvious inference 
>> that consciousness would not include consciousness of it's hardware 
>> implementation.
>> 
>> If consciousness is software, it can't know its hardware. But some like 
>> Searle or Penrose think the hardware is important.
> 
> I think the hardware is important when you're talking about a computer that 
> is emerged in some environment. 

That is right, but if you assume mechanism, that hardware comes from a (non 
computable) statistics on all software run in arithmetic.



> The hardware can define the the interaction with that environment. 

The environment is "made of” all computations getting at our relative 
computational states.




> We idealize the brain as a computer independent of it's physical 
> instantiation...but that's just a theoretical simplification.

Not when you assume mechanism, in which case it is the idea of "physical 
universe” which becomes the theoretical simplifications.

Bruno



> 
> Brent
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/5125d2b1-71c1-1d42-f1eb-cc152971b237%40verizon.net
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/5125d2b1-71c1-1d42-f1eb-cc152971b237%40verizon.net?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/5BDA0715-ADDC-4467-AB71-F87F32C01177%40ulb.ac.be.

Reply via email to