Alan DeKok [mailto:al...@deployingradius.com] writes:
> Glen Zorn wrote: > > Alan DeKok [mailto:al...@deployingradius.com] writes: > >> Discussing the applicability, cost, benefit, etc. of EAP-FAST is a > >> good idea. Re-visiting its architectural choices isn't something we > >> have time for. > > > > In other words, no technical review. OK, great, how about we just > let the > > Cisco & Juniper marketing departments slug it out & let us know who > wins? > > A technical review of EAP-FAST as it applies to the charter work > items > is relevant. This WG is also a reasonable place to discuss the status > of the current EAP-FAST document. However, re-designing EAP-FAST is > not > on the charter of this WG. > > Alan DeKok. _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
