Alan DeKok [mailto:al...@deployingradius.com] writes:
> Dan Harkins wrote: > > A tunnel method is definitely in our charter and we have had much > > discussion on what that would look like. If you re-read the notes > from > > IETF 71 there was a long discussion about choosing an existing one to > > update and not necessarily rolling a new one from scratch. The > candidates > > sure seem to be TTLS and FAST, given the presentations on them we've > had. > > Discussing the applicability, cost, benefit, etc. of EAP-FAST is a > good idea. Re-visiting its architectural choices isn't something we > have time for. In other words, no technical review. OK, great, how about we just let the Cisco & Juniper marketing departments slug it out & let us know who wins? > > Alan DeKok. > _______________________________________________ > Emu mailing list > Emu@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
