Glen Zorn wrote: > Alan DeKok [mailto:al...@deployingradius.com] writes: >> Discussing the applicability, cost, benefit, etc. of EAP-FAST is a >> good idea. Re-visiting its architectural choices isn't something we >> have time for. > > In other words, no technical review. OK, great, how about we just let the > Cisco & Juniper marketing departments slug it out & let us know who wins?
A technical review of EAP-FAST as it applies to the charter work items is relevant. This WG is also a reasonable place to discuss the status of the current EAP-FAST document. However, re-designing EAP-FAST is not on the charter of this WG. Alan DeKok. _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
