Glen Zorn wrote: > The point is that you stated that the charter "requires us to extend an > existing TLS-based tunneled method" when in fact it does nothing of the > sort. Either this was just an error that for some reason you refuse to > admit or you and Joe are interpreting the charter to mean that. Such > interpretation is w/i your purview as WG Chairs but since it is at least > unobvious, a non-null rationale would be appreciated.
You are free to propose *any* TLS-based EAP method that satisfies the tunneled requirements document. This includes new methods of your own invention. So far, only TTLS and FAST have been discussed. In the absence of additional proposals, we will likely be extending an existing method. Alan DeKok. _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
