> > Chris Hessing wrote: > > Further it bothers me more when > I see a NIST document that indicates that EAP-FAST is the best choice > for a secure, but easy to deploy, EAP method.
>Alan DeKok replied: >Do the NIST documents permit anonymous provisioning? [KH]: No. But I'll check whether the draft needs further clarifications in that regard. btw everybody is welcome to submit comments to 800-120comme...@nist.gov<800-120comme...@nist.gov?subject=comments%20sp%20800-120>with "Comments on SP 800-120" in the subject line. The comment period closes on January 30, 2009. The draft can be accessed at: http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/PubsDrafts.html. Katrin Hoeper
_______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
