On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Glen Zorn <glenz...@comcast.net> wrote:
> Chris Hessing wrote: > > > Further it bothers me more when > > I see a NIST document that indicates that EAP-FAST is the best choice > > for a secure, but easy to deploy, EAP method. > > >Alan DeKok replied: > > >Do the NIST documents permit anonymous provisioning? > > [KH]: No. > > Unfortunately w/o anonymous provisioning the "easy to deploy" part kind of > goes out the window… > The NIST draft never claimed that EAP-FAST is easy to deploy, neither does it say it is the best choice.....That was a misquotation of the draft. Katrin Hoeper
_______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
