Alan DeKok [mailto:[email protected]] writes:
> Glen Zorn wrote: > >> We discuss what has been proposed. If there is another TLS-based > EAP > >> method that should be included in the above list, feel free to > propose > >> it. > > > > This thread is not about what is being discussed or proposed, it's > about > > what the charter says. > > The charter does not require us to choose a particular method. The point is that you stated that the charter "requires us to extend an existing TLS-based tunneled method" when in fact it does nothing of the sort. Either this was just an error that for some reason you refuse to admit or you and Joe are interpreting the charter to mean that. Such interpretation is w/i your purview as WG Chairs but since it is at least unobvious, a non-null rationale would be appreciated. > > Alan DeKok. _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
