Hi Victor, On 7 Mar 2025, at 00:10, Victor Zhou <zzn=40namefi...@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> Our intention was not to claim it's hard to add a new RR type. it is not hard > to "add" it. It's hard to gain consensus without showing adoption first. What consensus do you mean? New RRTypes are assigned based on expert review. Consensus is not required. > It's not hard to declare "I" (unilaterally) am going to start treating RR > Type = N as a new type and the client I develop will treat RR Type = N that > way. The normal process is that you submit a template and get an assignment. You don't need to unilaterally declare the existence of a new RRType. > It's extremely hard, however, to show the world that some new RR Type = N has > been used by many services and clients for a specific use case and in a > certain way. Which parts of the world are you trying to convince in this example? Joe _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
