It appears that Bob Harold <rharo...@umich.edu> said: >We already have a problem with too many TXT records with the same name used >for different purposes. SPF, various validations, and who knows what else >are all at the same name. Could we do instead: >_RFCxxxx.domain.name IN TXT "<data>"
Why wouldn't you follow RFCs 8552 and 8553, pick a meaningful prefix, and put it in this registry? https://www.iana.org/assignments/dns-parameters/dns-parameters.xhtml#underscored-globally-scoped-dns-node-names R's, John _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org