It appears that Bob Harold  <rharo...@umich.edu> said:
>We already have a problem with too many TXT records with the same name used
>for different purposes.   SPF, various validations, and who knows what else
>are all at the same name.   Could we do instead:
>_RFCxxxx.domain.name  IN  TXT "<data>"

Why wouldn't you follow RFCs 8552 and 8553, pick a meaningful prefix, and put 
it in this registry?

https://www.iana.org/assignments/dns-parameters/dns-parameters.xhtml#underscored-globally-scoped-dns-node-names

R's,
John

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to