It appears that Victor Zhou <z...@namefi.io> said: >flagging this issue. We may consider replace all references to existing >unrelated RFC numbers (RFC7777, 8888, etc.) with clearly hypothetical >placeholders like RFCNNNN, RFCMMMM, RFCOOOO, and RFCPPPP to avoid >any confusion with actual RFCs....
Are you familiar with RFCs 8552 and 8553, and the IANA registry that RFC 8552 created? Not to put too fine a point on it, but your proposal appears to be worse than the existing practice that those two RFCs describe. It would be helpful if you could explain why this is an improvement. Also look at that registry, which contains over sixty existing underscore prefixes, and tell us why if you don't want to create a new RRTYPE, you would not just add another prefix to that registry and use that. R's, John _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
