* Since it's datatracker closing window before IETF-122, a version is published on https://github.com/xinbenlv/rfc-drafts/blob/main/draft-zzn-dns-new-rr-00.txt<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/xinbenlv/rfc-drafts/blob/main/draft-zzn-dns-new-rr-00.txt__;!!Hj18uoVe_Lnx!uRCAYs4S_kCIZr3ViM0dDflXrSSh7IiWaqlwTeb51Rs_XtnpfSFIlXIL992V6QanRrODXKIyL2v86XocRnOxvAyB43uhF_A$>, will submit once the window opens on Mar 15 or earlier if facilitated by chair/admin of the WG You might want to choose other examples on things that could exist… as what you list already exists:
§3.1 WALLET: already exists as RRtype, see value 262 in IANA registry §3.2 and §3.3 about basically storing public keys and certificates: see record types CERT, OPENPGPKEY, and TLSA. Also not using RFC numbers already existing and unrelated would be better I think.
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
