Victor Zhou writes: > It's extremely hard, however, to show the world that some new RR Type = N has > been used by many services and clients for a specific use case and in a > certain > way. That's why we are intending to come up with a way to show early adoption, > begin early adoption, and then migrate.
I don't quite understand how your proposed mechanism is an improvement for a way to show early adoption ... except, acknowledging John Levine's point, that current web platforms for editing zone contents continue to be an obstacle for using new types. Do you have something else in mind? That was just one of your five bullet points, and if it's the driving one then it should be focused and the four others, which are largely inaccurate, dropped. Or, we could focus on getting the biggest platforms to allow unknown types. Even if this proposal is pursued, let's not kid ourselves about "and then migrate". It's really just ultimately a means for overlaying multiple uses of TXT indefinitely. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
