Moin! On 18.02.2013, at 04:29, Joe Abley <jab...@hopcount.ca> wrote: > This is getting a bit tangential, but why is it important for NTA > distribution not to cross organisational boundaries? Because I and guess ISPs also don't want somebody to mess with the resolution answers of their resolver. If I screw up I am responsible, but if another third party that probably I don't have a contract with screws up who is responsible. As an admin of DNS Services at an ISP you will get that question if something goes bad, and that is why I didn't like the DLV approach. > If a standard distribution mechanism existed, how do you imagine a limited > scope could be enforced? It probably couldn't as people tend to ignore advices no matter how often you write them down. That's why I think we shouldn't include them in this draft.
So long -Ralf --- Ralf Weber Senior Infrastructure Architect Nominum Inc. 2000 Seaport Blvd. Suite 400 Redwood City, California 94063 ralf.we...@nominum.com _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
