On 17/02/2013 10:22, Livingood, Jason wrote:
Based on feedback yesterday on the list, I did a quick –04 update, which
is now at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-livingood-negative-trust-anchors/.
The are seven open issues documented at the end of the I-D. But the most
important questions for this WG are:
1 – Is this worth consideration as a WG I-D or should it continue only
as an individual I-D?
If we think this going to be used by many and over a "long" time then
the answer is yes
If they is just a hack to prevent few DNS resolver operators from
getting bad press because their operations are slandered by the mistakes
of a publisher of DNS information the answer is no.
I'm in the first camp, we should document this as BCP.
2 – If the answer to #1 is that it should be a WG I-D, would you like a
brief discussion of the open issues at IETF 86?
Yes.
Thanks!
Jason
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
