Hi Ralf, On 2013-02-17, at 22:19, Ralf Weber <ralf.we...@nominum.com> wrote:
> I fully agree on this, which is why I support this draft. However to achieve > that goal (making it easier for ISPs to implement DNSSEC) I don't think it is > necessary to specify how NTA will be distributed. If you think it is > important to have a vendor independent way of distributing NTA this might be > a second step, however it's usage should be very limited and not crossing > organizational boundaries. This is getting a bit tangential, but why is it important for NTA distribution not to cross organisational boundaries? If a standard distribution mechanism existed, how do you imagine a limited scope could be enforced? Joe _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
