Michael Tiernan <michael.tier...@gmail.com> writes:

> ----- "Daniel Rich" <dr...@employees.org> wrote:
> > and those tended to be
> > personality clashes more than technical skills.
> 
> This leads me to jump the track and ask a parallel question.
> 
> How do you handle getting asked about someone you work with or used to work 
> with?
> 
> Not really being asked as a reference, although that deserves discussion, but 
> just as an "off the cuff" question.

Saying things that are both true and also good, I think, is a good
thing for all involved.  

But, uh,  I won't give negative evaluations of individuals, and I 
try not to say bad things about competitors.  (businesses that are 
not my competitors, however, are fair game.) I might avoid the question, 
as you did, or I might outright refuse to answer if I really can't say 
anything good about the person, or if they are wholly unsuited for the 
job in question, but I won't say bad things about someone who has 
worked with or for me, at least not to a potential employer with whom 
I have no relationship.  

I think this is expected.   In all my years of asking for references, 
I've gotten lots on non-responses and outright refusals, but I've never 
heard a negative recommendation for anyone I've been involved with hiring.

I mean, the requester knows that he's asking me (someone he usually 
doesn't know very well)  for an opinion on someone I do know, someone
I have a relationship with.   The assumption is that I'm going to error
on the side of the positive.   

It is different when it's an employer, a client, or someone
else with whom you have a relationship asking for an evaluation.  In
that case, I try to be as honest and impartial as I can.  But I 
think in the usual case, where someone random asks you about someone you
know, it's in your interest to say things that are both true and 
good about the person, and to otherwise not say anything.  
I think this is a little like the tradition of taking an employee into
your office and closing the door before reprimanding or firing them.
There's no reason why everyone in the office needs to hear it, 
/especially/ if the problem is a personality conflict.   

Personally, I think that providing a negative evaluation goes beyond
any sort of responsibility that you have to people you don't know.   
Sure, if I'm on a deserted road and I see a breakdown, I'll stop to 
help, but if I'm in a real hurry, or if the area looks unsafe?  eh, 
I'll call it in when I get cell coverage.   There are limits on
what random people can expect from me.  sorry.  

_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lopsa.org
http://lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
 http://lopsa.org/

Reply via email to