On 2011-12-14 6:41 PM, Florian Effenberger
<flo...@documentfoundation.org> wrote:
So, my point is the following:
- I have people strongly asking for disabling reply-to mangling, e.g. on
the website list.
- I have people strongly asking for leaving reply-to mangling as is.
- So, whatever I do, someone will be upset.
- I myself would like to keep reply-to mangling as is, as I have set it
up for good reasons.
- We have been discussing that issue for two months now without any
clear result, it still is that some people want it, some don't.
So, what shall I do? Flip a coin?
On the dovecot mail list, the user can CHOOSE whether or not reply-to
mangling is used. So, the best of both worlds. I believe they are using
mailman for the list server.
I understand there are technical reasons (mainly to do with the ability
of list admins to have their own separate passwords) that you don't want
to use mailman, but these problems are all solved by the up and coming
mailman3.
So, my proposal is to DEFER this decision until after mailman3 is
released, migrate the lists to mailman3, then simply document how
individual list subscribers can choose their poison.
I'd also suggest that the DEFAULT be to enable reply-to mangling, and
explain to the user how they can change this in the welcom emessage that
is sent.
Charles
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
