Hello,
Friedrich Strohmaier wrote on 2011-12-14 23:56:
So go ahead! Enjoy the impact You might cause. Enjoy counting corpses.
Corpse's Bride is a nice movie, but I guess you are not talking about
it. ;-)
So, my point is the following:
- I have people strongly asking for disabling reply-to mangling, e.g. on
the website list.
- I have people strongly asking for leaving reply-to mangling as is.
- So, whatever I do, someone will be upset.
- I myself would like to keep reply-to mangling as is, as I have set it
up for good reasons.
- We have been discussing that issue for two months now without any
clear result, it still is that some people want it, some don't.
So, what shall I do? Flip a coin?
Nobody really knows what happens when we enable it. So, my proposal was,
to try it out - after announcing this test - on a list where it was
demanded, and where people are probably technically savvy enough to deal
with it.
What exactly is wrong about this proposal? What did I miss? This
question is serious, no pun intended. I really feel like sitting between
two chairs, and try to find the best compromise possible.
Again, people left to me ask for leaving things as is, people right to
me ask for changing them. What now?
Florian
--
Florian Effenberger <flo...@documentfoundation.org>
Board of Directors at The Document Foundation
Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
