Late +1 from me too. пн, 14 жовт. 2024 р. о 12:45 Russell Spitzer <russell.spit...@gmail.com> пише:
> Vote has completed and the Proposal is approved > > +1 Votes From > > Steven Wu > Yufei Gu > Amogh Jahagirdar > Jack Ye > Daniel Weeks > Eduard Tudenhöfner > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 8:11 PM Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 2:52 PM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> Yufei >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 3:47 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1, I've been reviewing this proposal/spec change for a bit and I think >>>> it's in a good state for the community to work on an implementation. >>>> >>>> Thanks Russell for driving this! >>>> >>>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 3:31 PM Jack Ye <yezhao...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1, overall agree that we should add this! >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> Jack Ye >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 1:43 PM Daniel Weeks <dwe...@apache.org> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks Russell! >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 6:57 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner < >>>>>> etudenhoef...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I left a few comments on the proposal but I'm overall +1 on the >>>>>>> proposal >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 12:08 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré < >>>>>>> j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I did a review on the proposal and it looks good to me. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>> JB >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 3:55 PM Russell Spitzer >>>>>>>> <russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > Hi Y'all! >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > I think we are more or less in agreement on adding Row Lineage to >>>>>>>> the spec apart from a few details which may change a bit during >>>>>>>> implementation. Because of this, I'd like to call for an overall vote >>>>>>>> on >>>>>>>> whether or not Row-Lineage as described in PR 11130 can be added to >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> spec. >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > I'll note this is basically giving a thumbs up for reviewers and >>>>>>>> implementers to go ahead with the pull-request and acknowledging that >>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>> support the direction this proposal is going. I do think we'll >>>>>>>> probably dig >>>>>>>> a few things out when we write the reference implementation, but I >>>>>>>> think in >>>>>>>> general we have defined the required behaviors we want to see. >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > Please vote in the next 72 hours >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > [ ] +1, commit the proposed spec changes >>>>>>>> > [ ] -0 >>>>>>>> > [ ] -1, do not make these changes because . . . >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > Thanks everyone, >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > Russ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
