+1

On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 2:52 PM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
> Yufei
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 3:47 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1, I've been reviewing this proposal/spec change for a bit and I think
>> it's in a good state for the community to work on an implementation.
>>
>> Thanks Russell for driving this!
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 3:31 PM Jack Ye <yezhao...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1, overall agree that we should add this!
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Jack Ye
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 1:43 PM Daniel Weeks <dwe...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> Thanks Russell!
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 6:57 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner <
>>>> etudenhoef...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I left a few comments on the proposal but I'm overall +1 on the
>>>>> proposal
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 12:08 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I did a review on the proposal and it looks good to me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 3:55 PM Russell Spitzer
>>>>>> <russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Hi Y'all!
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > I think we are more or less in agreement on adding Row Lineage to
>>>>>> the spec apart from a few details which may change a bit during
>>>>>> implementation. Because of this, I'd like to call for an overall vote on
>>>>>> whether or not Row-Lineage as described in  PR 11130 can be added to the
>>>>>> spec.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > I'll note this is basically giving a thumbs up for reviewers and
>>>>>> implementers to go ahead with the pull-request and acknowledging that you
>>>>>> support the direction this proposal is going. I do think we'll probably 
>>>>>> dig
>>>>>> a few things out when we write the reference implementation, but I think 
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> general we have defined the required behaviors we want to see.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Please vote in the next 72 hours
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > [ ] +1, commit the proposed spec changes
>>>>>> > [ ] -0
>>>>>> > [ ] -1, do not make these changes because . . .
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Thanks everyone,
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Russ
>>>>>>
>>>>>

Reply via email to