+1 On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 2:52 PM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 > Yufei > > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 3:47 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1, I've been reviewing this proposal/spec change for a bit and I think >> it's in a good state for the community to work on an implementation. >> >> Thanks Russell for driving this! >> >> On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 3:31 PM Jack Ye <yezhao...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> +1, overall agree that we should add this! >>> >>> Best, >>> Jack Ye >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 1:43 PM Daniel Weeks <dwe...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> Thanks Russell! >>>> >>>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 6:57 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner < >>>> etudenhoef...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I left a few comments on the proposal but I'm overall +1 on the >>>>> proposal >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 12:08 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 >>>>>> >>>>>> I did a review on the proposal and it looks good to me. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> JB >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 3:55 PM Russell Spitzer >>>>>> <russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Hi Y'all! >>>>>> > >>>>>> > I think we are more or less in agreement on adding Row Lineage to >>>>>> the spec apart from a few details which may change a bit during >>>>>> implementation. Because of this, I'd like to call for an overall vote on >>>>>> whether or not Row-Lineage as described in PR 11130 can be added to the >>>>>> spec. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > I'll note this is basically giving a thumbs up for reviewers and >>>>>> implementers to go ahead with the pull-request and acknowledging that you >>>>>> support the direction this proposal is going. I do think we'll probably >>>>>> dig >>>>>> a few things out when we write the reference implementation, but I think >>>>>> in >>>>>> general we have defined the required behaviors we want to see. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Please vote in the next 72 hours >>>>>> > >>>>>> > [ ] +1, commit the proposed spec changes >>>>>> > [ ] -0 >>>>>> > [ ] -1, do not make these changes because . . . >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Thanks everyone, >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Russ >>>>>> >>>>>