+1 Yufei
On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 3:47 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1, I've been reviewing this proposal/spec change for a bit and I think > it's in a good state for the community to work on an implementation. > > Thanks Russell for driving this! > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 3:31 PM Jack Ye <yezhao...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1, overall agree that we should add this! >> >> Best, >> Jack Ye >> >> On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 1:43 PM Daniel Weeks <dwe...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> Thanks Russell! >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 6:57 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner < >>> etudenhoef...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> I left a few comments on the proposal but I'm overall +1 on the proposal >>>> >>>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 12:08 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> I did a review on the proposal and it looks good to me. >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> JB >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 3:55 PM Russell Spitzer >>>>> <russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > Hi Y'all! >>>>> > >>>>> > I think we are more or less in agreement on adding Row Lineage to >>>>> the spec apart from a few details which may change a bit during >>>>> implementation. Because of this, I'd like to call for an overall vote on >>>>> whether or not Row-Lineage as described in PR 11130 can be added to the >>>>> spec. >>>>> > >>>>> > I'll note this is basically giving a thumbs up for reviewers and >>>>> implementers to go ahead with the pull-request and acknowledging that you >>>>> support the direction this proposal is going. I do think we'll probably >>>>> dig >>>>> a few things out when we write the reference implementation, but I think >>>>> in >>>>> general we have defined the required behaviors we want to see. >>>>> > >>>>> > Please vote in the next 72 hours >>>>> > >>>>> > [ ] +1, commit the proposed spec changes >>>>> > [ ] -0 >>>>> > [ ] -1, do not make these changes because . . . >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > Thanks everyone, >>>>> > >>>>> > Russ >>>>> >>>>
