+1, I've been reviewing this proposal/spec change for a bit and I think it's in a good state for the community to work on an implementation.
Thanks Russell for driving this! On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 3:31 PM Jack Ye <yezhao...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1, overall agree that we should add this! > > Best, > Jack Ye > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 1:43 PM Daniel Weeks <dwe...@apache.org> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Thanks Russell! >> >> On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 6:57 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner < >> etudenhoef...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> I left a few comments on the proposal but I'm overall +1 on the proposal >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 12:08 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> I did a review on the proposal and it looks good to me. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> JB >>>> >>>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 3:55 PM Russell Spitzer >>>> <russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > Hi Y'all! >>>> > >>>> > I think we are more or less in agreement on adding Row Lineage to the >>>> spec apart from a few details which may change a bit during implementation. >>>> Because of this, I'd like to call for an overall vote on whether or not >>>> Row-Lineage as described in PR 11130 can be added to the spec. >>>> > >>>> > I'll note this is basically giving a thumbs up for reviewers and >>>> implementers to go ahead with the pull-request and acknowledging that you >>>> support the direction this proposal is going. I do think we'll probably dig >>>> a few things out when we write the reference implementation, but I think in >>>> general we have defined the required behaviors we want to see. >>>> > >>>> > Please vote in the next 72 hours >>>> > >>>> > [ ] +1, commit the proposed spec changes >>>> > [ ] -0 >>>> > [ ] -1, do not make these changes because . . . >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > Thanks everyone, >>>> > >>>> > Russ >>>> >>>
