+1, overall agree that we should add this! Best, Jack Ye
On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 1:43 PM Daniel Weeks <dwe...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 > > Thanks Russell! > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 6:57 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner < > etudenhoef...@apache.org> wrote: > >> I left a few comments on the proposal but I'm overall +1 on the proposal >> >> On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 12:08 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> I did a review on the proposal and it looks good to me. >>> >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 3:55 PM Russell Spitzer >>> <russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >>> > Hi Y'all! >>> > >>> > I think we are more or less in agreement on adding Row Lineage to the >>> spec apart from a few details which may change a bit during implementation. >>> Because of this, I'd like to call for an overall vote on whether or not >>> Row-Lineage as described in PR 11130 can be added to the spec. >>> > >>> > I'll note this is basically giving a thumbs up for reviewers and >>> implementers to go ahead with the pull-request and acknowledging that you >>> support the direction this proposal is going. I do think we'll probably dig >>> a few things out when we write the reference implementation, but I think in >>> general we have defined the required behaviors we want to see. >>> > >>> > Please vote in the next 72 hours >>> > >>> > [ ] +1, commit the proposed spec changes >>> > [ ] -0 >>> > [ ] -1, do not make these changes because . . . >>> > >>> > >>> > Thanks everyone, >>> > >>> > Russ >>> >>
