On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 2:10 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > A key thing about FlexJS though is that we are trying to make the tools > > “framework-agnostic” so I’m not sure there are as many edges as there are > > for a monolithic framework like the current Flex SDK. If Josh were > > starting Feathers today off of FlexJS, in theory he wouldn’t have had to > > muck with the compiler at all. > > > > Which is why (as I have said in the past), FlexJS is a poor name for this. > There is really nothing 'JS' related in the framework itself. A while ago, > I mucked around with the AS part of 'FlexJS' and was able to get a very > basic starling based application out of it. I believe it would be even > easier to get a FeathersUI app. > > So when you say framework here, you are referring to Application right? Can you tell me "What" you did to get a Starling app to run using the "framework". I am trying to see why you would even want to do this? Starling just bootstraps with an easy main .as class. Mike > There are two parts: the framework which lets you create any kind of app > using AS3 and MXML. And then there is a JS transpiler (FalconJX) The > framework part can be technically be used to create any kind of application > (think iOS, Android, Starling, etc.) > > Thanks, > Om >
