> > > A key thing about FlexJS though is that we are trying to make the tools > “framework-agnostic” so I’m not sure there are as many edges as there are > for a monolithic framework like the current Flex SDK. If Josh were > starting Feathers today off of FlexJS, in theory he wouldn’t have had to > muck with the compiler at all. >
Which is why (as I have said in the past), FlexJS is a poor name for this. There is really nothing 'JS' related in the framework itself. A while ago, I mucked around with the AS part of 'FlexJS' and was able to get a very basic starling based application out of it. I believe it would be even easier to get a FeathersUI app. There are two parts: the framework which lets you create any kind of app using AS3 and MXML. And then there is a JS transpiler (FalconJX) The framework part can be technically be used to create any kind of application (think iOS, Android, Starling, etc.) Thanks, Om
