Absolutely. :) Go ahead and get things started by writing up something for the transaction website, then we can proceed from there.
I'll come up with a change for the Attributes site. Hen 2010/4/6 Oliver Zeigermann <oliver.zeigerm...@gmail.com>: > That sounds reasonable. > > I will be off for a week or so, and might need some help to accomplish > the task. Maybe we can retire the concerned projects in a bulk and > share the work? > > - Oliver > > 2010/4/7 Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com>: >> My method when consensus seems very likely but you want to ensure it's >> explicit is to announce you're going to do it in 3 days. >> >> As to the 'it', it means some level of the Attic'ing tasks. >> >> * Definitely should update the website to explain that it's been >> retired and why. I don't think this is a case of waiting for community >> to show up again (thus why I prefer retired to dormant), we're EOL'ing >> the component. >> >> * Should send an email out to commons-user/dev at the very least. Not >> sure if we need to email annou...@. >> >> * Make the JIRA read-only. >> >> * Tempted to leave the SVN as is, but make it read-only; rather than >> do a move to dormant/. I think we should avoid changing the svn >> location of released components. >> >> * Remove from the trunks-proper svn:externals. >> >> * Remove from CI systems + Gump. >> >> I think there are a few others to retire: >> >> # Attributes. >> # Discovery >> # Modeler (consider) >> # Launcher (consider) >> # Betwixt (consider) >> >> Hen >> >> 2010/4/5 Oliver Zeigermann <oliver.zeigerm...@gmail.com>: >>> Folks! >>> >>> The only discussion seems to be about "how to retire the project", not >>> "if to retire the project". This means to me we all agree to at least >>> temporarily retire it and there is no more discussion about how to do >>> it. >>> >>> As the Apache commons way of retiring seems to be to move it to the >>> dormant section that is what I propose. >>> >>> What are the next steps? Do we need a formal vote? Or are we just doing it? >>> >>> - Oliver >>> >>> 2010/3/29 Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org>: >>>> +1 to push any inactive projects to the attic. they can always be >>>> moved back if real activity begins. >>>> >>>> 2010/3/28 Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com>: >>>>> 2010/3/28 Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com>: >>>>>> Niall Pemberton wrote: >>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> 2010/3/28 Rafał Krupiński <r.krupin...@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>>> On 28.03.2010 20:13, Henri Yandell wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Unless anyone speaks up for it, I'm all for our making a Retired >>>>>>>>>> section and moving Transaction to it. Possibly we could relabel >>>>>>>>>> 'Dormant' then to be more Sandbox focused and consider some others >>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>> Retired (Attributes, Discovery, Modeler jump to mind). >>>>>>>>> You mean something like Apache Attic? >>>>>>>> Fair point. Let's assume moving it to the Attic. I'm not sure it'll be >>>>>>>> a perfect fit, but if it doesn't we can always maintain our own >>>>>>>> Retired page. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I guess I shouldn't be telling you how the attic works, but IMO its >>>>>>> for projects which don't have a functioning PMC. Thats not the case >>>>>>> for Commons so I think it would be better to keep *retired* components >>>>>>> here. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 - and I am not sure we can really distinguish "retired" from >>>>>> "dormant." Not breathing is not breathing and resurrection is >>>>>> resurrection. :) >>>>> >>>>> Xang went to the Attic from the XML PMC, and Slide + Taglibs (minus >>>>> those that went to Tomcat) are expected to go there from Jakarta, so >>>>> it's definitely not been limited only to those without PMCs. I think >>>>> we could do either option and am not tied to either. >>>>> >>>>> Attic-wise... I was thinking of making a page there, much as Taglibs >>>>> will have, which will list retired components. >>>>> >>>>> Commons-wise, we'd have a retired page and probably link to it from >>>>> the Attic page as an FYI. So really all we're talking about is the url >>>>> for the retired page and the process for restarting a component. >>>>> >>>>> Hen >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>>> >>>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
