On 16/04/2010, Oliver Zeigermann <oliver.zeigerm...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2010/4/16 sebb <seb...@gmail.com>: > > >> > * Tempted to leave the SVN as is, but make it read-only; rather than > >> > do a move to dormant/. I think we should avoid changing the svn > >> > location of released components. > >> > >> > >> I think the consensus more or less was to move it into svn dormant, right? > >> > >> Can I simply check out the whole proper/transaction sub directory and > >> then move it to dormant/transaction? Or will that mess up any > >> tagging/branches? > > > > Yes, that will mess up history too. The following command: > > > > svn move -m"Transaction => Dormant" oldurl newurl > > > > where oldurl/newurl are the https: urls > > > > should do the trick whilst maintaining history. > > > OK, cool, will do. > > > >> > * Remove from CI systems + Gump. > >> > >> > >> No idea how to do that either. Can someone else do that? (same as jira > >> read only) > >> > > > > I can do that - just means deleting the Continuum entry and the Gump > > entry from projects/commons-proper.xml (or whatever it is called). > > > Great, please do so. >
Is there a JIRA entry for this work? It would be useful as a way to keep track of the individual tasks, and we can then use it as a base for any future moves. > - Oliver > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
