Unless anyone speaks up for it, I'm all for our making a Retired section and moving Transaction to it. Possibly we could relabel 'Dormant' then to be more Sandbox focused and consider some others for Retired (Attributes, Discovery, Modeler jump to mind).
Are the other useful parts worth putting in another library? On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 2:41 AM, Oliver Zeigermann <ozeigerm...@apache.org> wrote: > Folks! > > While developing the 2.0 version of commons transaction I got stuck on > implementing a usable transactional file system. As I am convinced > this is not possible on top of an ordinary file system I suggest to > retire the project. Although there are other useful parts (as multi > level locking including deadlock detection) the transactional file > system is the main reason people use this library for. As it simply > can not be made fully transactional, it does not work as advertised > and for that reason it should be taken off from Apache commons. > > I will not invest more work into the project, but if anyone else is > willing to take this any further please follow up to this post. > > Cheers > > - Oliver > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
