Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> wrote: >> 2010/3/28 Rafał Krupiński <r.krupin...@gmail.com>: >>> On 28.03.2010 20:13, Henri Yandell wrote: >>>> Unless anyone speaks up for it, I'm all for our making a Retired >>>> section and moving Transaction to it. Possibly we could relabel >>>> 'Dormant' then to be more Sandbox focused and consider some others for >>>> Retired (Attributes, Discovery, Modeler jump to mind). >>> You mean something like Apache Attic? >> Fair point. Let's assume moving it to the Attic. I'm not sure it'll be >> a perfect fit, but if it doesn't we can always maintain our own >> Retired page. > > I guess I shouldn't be telling you how the attic works, but IMO its > for projects which don't have a functioning PMC. Thats not the case > for Commons so I think it would be better to keep *retired* components > here. >
+1 - and I am not sure we can really distinguish "retired" from "dormant." Not breathing is not breathing and resurrection is resurrection. :) Phil --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
