On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 5:09 AM, Jochen Wiedmann <jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2010/4/7 Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com>: > >> * Tempted to leave the SVN as is, but make it read-only; rather than >> do a move to dormant/. I think we should avoid changing the svn >> location of released components. > > Disagree with that point. A committer can be expected to deal with SVN > moves, otherwise he or she won't be able to deal with branches. And > for the user it is best to have a clear distinction between sandbox, > proper and dormant. (Whether we call it dormant, retired, or whatever > doesn't matter.) > <snip/>
I say move out of proper in SVN (to dormant / retired / TBD) as well. -Rahul --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
