On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 3:20 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi simon... > > Thanks a lot :), but I like the idea of Naill, that is make a > sandbox project for Validator2, so I can work away from the release > process of the current implementation of validator - Validator1, and > when I have a working thing, we can get it out of sandbox to commons > proper as part of the main Validator project, so people can have 2 > falvours of Validator either 1/2. What do you think Naill ??
Yes I'm happy with that. I'll leave it a couple of days, to give other people a chance to give opnions - but if there are no objections/other proposals then I'll go ahead and set that up in the Sandbox. For sandbox access I think its just a case of pinging the list (probably best in another thread, as it might get missed in this one) to ask for Sandbox karma for yourself and your MyFaces colleague. Niall > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 5:11 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Mohammed, > > > > One of the purposes of the commons project is to pool the work of other > > commons projects, ie extract bits out of other projects that can be more > > widely applied. Therefore, the commons project is pretty open to > > existing committers on other Apache projects getting commit access to > > commons. > > > > As long as the PMC/existing validator developers are happy with the > > general idea, I think it likely that you (and any other interested > > apache committers) would just be granted commit access to apply changes > > yourself. > > > > Regards, > > Simon > > > > Mohammad Nour El-Din schrieb: > > > > > > > Sorry for the last stupid question I could have know it from site, but > > > one more - I hope not stupid - question, you will apply the Validator2 > > > code in trunk and make old validator in a separate branch ??? > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Niall Pemberton > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din > > >> > > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >>> Just to make sure, this is where trunk code exist > > >>> > > >> > > > >> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/validator/trunk/ > > >> > > > >> > > >> Yes > > >> > > >> Niall > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 4:54 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din > > >> > > > >> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > I skimmed over the JSR - not a detailed look actually - and > through > > >> > > using annotations you declare the validator class, so we can > adapt the > > >> > > current validators, or at least make minor changes to make them > > >> > > suitable to be used through JSR#303/Validator2 impl. I will > download > > >> > > the code today and take a more detailed look at JSR PDF and if > I found > > >> > > more info I will send them back by the end of this week. > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Niall Pemberton > > >> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > > > > > >> > > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > > > > Hi All... > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > Recently an EDR JSR#303 has been published on JCP - > > >> > > > > http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=303 . They intend to make > a unified > > >> > > > > Bean Validation APIs/Framework based on using annotations > and XML > > >> > > > > configuration files, and they define the way how to apply > and use > > >> > > > > validation, and it will be part of the Java Beans model. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > I am a committer in Apache OpenEJB, and we need such > functionality for > > >> > > > > bean validation through the process of deploying an > enterprise java > > >> > > > > bean - we have a home made validation framework now. And > I have a > > >> > > > > colleague of mine who is working in Apache MyFaces > Tomahawk- > > >> > > > > http://myfaces.apache.org/tomahawk/index.html - and he is > interested > > >> > > > > in such functionality to apply validation regarding JSF. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > My colleague and I are very interested in implementing > this JSR in > > >> > > > > Apache Commons Validator, but seems that the project is > not active for > > >> > > > > a while, so I am asking how our changes are going to be > applied to > > >> > > > > Commons Validator. I mean are we going to submit changes > in patches > > >> > > > > and someone will review and commit - but no one is active > now to do > > >> > > > > that. Or I can get a committer access to apply changes > and review > > >> > > > > patches submitted by my colleague. Please advice and help. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Do you have an idea how you want to do this in Commons > Validator? > > >> > > > Specifically I'm wondering whether this would be a re-write > or whether > > >> > > > you think the exisiting framework could be adapated to JSR > 303? My > > >> > > > thinking was that implementing JSR 303 would involved and > > >> > > > brand-new-replacement for the existing framework - > Validator2. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Niall > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > P.S. I need your reply ASAP to stat planning and > coordination with my colleague. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > -- > Thanks > - Mohammad Nour > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
