Hi Mohammed, To clarify, the process Niall recommended is as follows:
(1) You send an email in a separate thread, requesting sandbox commit rights for yourself and the other initial committer. Provide your apache ids of course. It might be nice to provide links to show some evidence of your committer access, eg links to the "developers" lists for the projects you currently are committers for. Also provide a very brief summary of what you intend to do in the sandbox, for people who have not read this thread. (2) After a couple of days, assuming there are no objections to this proposal, Niall (or someone else) will copy validator trunk into the sandbox. (3) Hopefully your sandbox commit rights will also be done by then and you can get started. Of course, you can also use the next few days to start a design discussion on this list, or create some wiki pages for architectural discussion, links to the relevant projects, etc. I'm happy to help with getting this project started if needed (I'm also a MyFaces committer). Regards, Simon Mohammad Nour El-Din schrieb: > And u did it :( ??? > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 6:07 PM, Niall Pemberton > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 3:58 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>> Thanks Niall a lot. One last question for the sandbox project - if >>> >> > approved - can I help you in creating whatever required for that >> > project, I just want to learn how these things are made :), I mean >> > steap related to creating new projects and so . >> >> Acutally, I think if you get Karma then you can do it yourself - I was >> just going to create a validator2 directory here: >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/sandbox/ >> >> and then copy the validator trunk. >> >> >> >> Niall >> >> > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Niall Pemberton >> > >> > >> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 3:20 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din >> > > >> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > >> > > > Hi simon... >> > > > >> > > > Thanks a lot :), but I like the idea of Naill, that is make a >> > > > sandbox project for Validator2, so I can work away from the release >> > > > process of the current implementation of validator - Validator1, >> and >> > > > when I have a working thing, we can get it out of sandbox to >> commons >> > > > proper as part of the main Validator project, so people can have 2 >> > > > falvours of Validator either 1/2. What do you think Naill ?? >> > > >> > > Yes I'm happy with that. I'll leave it a couple of days, to give other >> > > people a chance to give opnions - but if there are no objections/other >> > > proposals then I'll go ahead and set that up in the Sandbox. For >> > > sandbox access I think its just a case of pinging the list (probably >> > > best in another thread, as it might get missed in this one) to ask for >> > > Sandbox karma for yourself and your MyFaces colleague. >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Niall >> > > >> > > > >> > > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 5:11 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > > > Hi Mohammed, >> > > > > >> > > > > One of the purposes of the commons project is to pool the work >> of other >> > > > > commons projects, ie extract bits out of other projects that >> can be more >> > > > > widely applied. Therefore, the commons project is pretty open to >> > > > > existing committers on other Apache projects getting commit >> access to >> > > > > commons. >> > > > > >> > > > > As long as the PMC/existing validator developers are happy with >> the >> > > > > general idea, I think it likely that you (and any other >> interested >> > > > > apache committers) would just be granted commit access to apply >> changes >> > > > > yourself. >> > > > > >> > > > > Regards, >> > > > > Simon >> > > > > >> > > > > Mohammad Nour El-Din schrieb: >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > Sorry for the last stupid question I could have know it from >> site, but >> > > > > > one more - I hope not stupid - question, you will apply the >> Validator2 >> > > > > > code in trunk and make old validator in a separate branch ??? >> > > > > > >> > > > > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Niall Pemberton >> > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >>> Just to make sure, this is where trunk code exist >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/validator/trunk/ >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> Yes >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> Niall >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 4:54 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > > I skimmed over the JSR - not a detailed look actually - >> and through >> > > > > >> > > using annotations you declare the validator class, so >> we can adapt the >> > > > > >> > > current validators, or at least make minor changes to >> make them >> > > > > >> > > suitable to be used through JSR#303/Validator2 impl. >> I will download >> > > > > >> > > the code today and take a more detailed look at JSR >> PDF and if I found >> > > > > >> > > more info I will send them back by the end of this >> week. >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Niall Pemberton >> > > > > >> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Mohammad Nour >> El-Din <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > Hi All... >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > Recently an EDR JSR#303 has been published on >> JCP - >> > > > > >> > > > > http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=303 . They >> intend to make a unified >> > > > > >> > > > > Bean Validation APIs/Framework based on using >> annotations and XML >> > > > > >> > > > > configuration files, and they define the way >> how to apply and use >> > > > > >> > > > > validation, and it will be part of the Java >> Beans model. >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > I am a committer in Apache OpenEJB, and we need >> such functionality for >> > > > > >> > > > > bean validation through the process of >> deploying an enterprise java >> > > > > >> > > > > bean - we have a home made validation framework >> now. And I have a >> > > > > >> > > > > colleague of mine who is working in Apache >> MyFaces Tomahawk- >> > > > > >> > > > > http://myfaces.apache.org/tomahawk/index.html - >> and he is interested >> > > > > >> > > > > in such functionality to apply validation >> regarding JSF. >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > My colleague and I are very interested in >> implementing this JSR in >> > > > > >> > > > > Apache Commons Validator, but seems that the >> project is not active for >> > > > > >> > > > > a while, so I am asking how our changes are >> going to be applied to >> > > > > >> > > > > Commons Validator. I mean are we going to >> submit changes in patches >> > > > > >> > > > > and someone will review and commit - but no one >> is active now to do >> > > > > >> > > > > that. Or I can get a committer access to apply >> changes and review >> > > > > >> > > > > patches submitted by my colleague. Please >> advice and help. >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > Do you have an idea how you want to do this in >> Commons Validator? >> > > > > >> > > > Specifically I'm wondering whether this would be a >> re-write or whether >> > > > > >> > > > you think the exisiting framework could be >> adapated to JSR 303? My >> > > > > >> > > > thinking was that implementing JSR 303 would >> involved and >> > > > > >> > > > brand-new-replacement for the existing framework - >> Validator2. >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > Niall >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > P.S. I need your reply ASAP to stat planning >> and coordination with my colleague. >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > -- >> > > > Thanks >> > > > - Mohammad Nour >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Thanks >> > - Mohammad Nour >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
